Runs after a reviewer finishes a book and answers the two questions that
gate the next stage:
1. Are there utterances with no speaker?
2. Now that speakers have been defined, renamed, merged or deleted, are
there utterances that should change?
Read-only - it never edits the database, and a test asserts the files are
byte-identical afterwards. Output is a markdown table and a CSV, one row per
finding with chapter, utterance number and a text preview, so each item is
locatable rather than a count.
Deal Hunter, after the completed review (56 speakers, 0 still needing
review, 4319 utterances):
- Dialogue with no speaker: 0. The 1803 speakerless rows are narration
and scene breaks, which is correct and is reported as a number rather
than silently dropped.
- Utterances attributed to a deleted speaker: 0.
- One speaker stored under two spellings: 6 rows across 3 speakers
(narrator/Narrator, Kainda/Princess Kainda, Willamina Wake/Captain).
All resolve to one voice so the audio is correct, but a per-speaker
export would split them into six - caught before the translation stage,
not after.
- 6 speech-tag mismatches where the narration immediately before the line
names a different speaker.
- 10 dialogue rows voiced by the narrator: 9 are quoted labels ("Reactor.",
"operations") that are correctly read by the narrator, 1 (ch28 utt46) is
a real segmentation error. Classified advisory so the one real defect is
not buried under nine false positives.
build_alias_map moved from scripts/qa_attribution.py into attribution_qa.py
so the CLI and the audit cannot disagree about what a speech tag resolves to;
qa_attribution output verified byte-identical.
13 new tests. Suite: 721 passed, 8 pre-existing.
9bda553311